Jordan Technology Report
SEE OTHER BRANDS

Get your science and technology news from Jordan

Two Former WHO Leaders Warn: Rejecting Harm Reduction Will Cost 100 Million Lives

Former WHO Director Derek Yach

Former WHO Director Derek Yach

Former WHO Director Tikki Pang

Former WHO Director Tikki Pang

Two former senior staff from WHO call for governments to embrace tobacco harm reduction and save 100 million lives ahead of the WHO FCTC's COP11 meeting

BRUSSELS, BRUSSELS, BELGIUM, November 4, 2025 /EINPresswire.com/ -- Two former Directors at the World Health Organisation have called for a radical overhaul of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) - the WHO’s International Treaty on tobacco control policy - which they argue could save over 100 million lives by 2060, according to recent research conducted by Derek Yach, one of the piece's signatories.

The piece is available in English, French, Spanish, German, Italian and Polish on Clearing the Air's website.

Yach, a key figure in creating the WHO’s tobacco policy in the 1990s, joined forces with Tikki Pang, who ran the WHO’s Policy Research function, to pen the piece alongside leading economist Chris Snowdon of the Institute for Economic Affairs, and co-founder Clearing the Air Peter Beckett.

Countries that have signed the FCTC will meet in Geneva from 17th November to discuss progress on global tobacco control policy, where they will face calls to pile restrictions onto safer nicotine products. Yach and Pang are adamant that these calls must be rejected.

“This is a moment that requires courage”, the piece concludes. “Courage for governments to challenge old dogmas, courage for industry to align its resources with public health, and courage for civil society to uphold science over ideology”.

Yach and Pang specifically call out scientific journals and societies for failing doctors and medical professionals.

“Scientific societies and journals must recognise their ethical responsibility to ensure that the benefits of harm reduction are widely understood among healthcare professionals. Uninformed or misinformed clinicians remain a key barrier to adoption” they write.

“The very same societies and journals speaking out against the global spread of vaccine hesitancy need to review their policies and act accordingly”.

The group also lays out, in stark terms, what failing to embrace harm reduction means for poorer countries.

“Low and middle income countries face decades of immense health and economic strain if urgent measures are not taken” they argue. “It is in this sobering context that we believe COP11 must confront a pressing reality: harm reduction for tobacco is not a theoretical debate but a proven strategy with lifesaving outcomes”.

They go on to contrast progress in more developed nations with that of the global South, where WHO tobacco policy is often taken on unquestioned.

“Heated tobacco product use has surged in Japan, South Korea, Italy, Poland, and Germany…vaping has fast gained ground in the United States, United Kingdom, Russia, and Romania, where cigarette prevalence is falling rapidly as millions transition to lower-risk alternatives”.

“Meanwhile, in Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Iceland, the widespread use of snus and nicotine pouches has pushed smoking and cancer rates to some of the lowest levels recorded globally. These countries demonstrate that human behaviour can be redirected in safer ways when consumers are presented with viable alternatives”.

“By contrast, in countries such as Indonesia, China, Egypt, and Jordan, male smoking rates still exceed 45 percent—levels that Britain last saw in the 1960s”.

“For many delegates [to the WHO’s Framework Convention conference] and advocates, the call to rethink harm reduction will be uncomfortable” they conclude.

“Decades of justified distrust of tobacco companies created an environment in which it was safer—politically and morally—to reject any alignment with industry. But this rigidity risks entrenching harm where greater flexibility could save millions of lives. Just as public health eventually embraced needle exchange programs, opioid substitution therapy, and more recently harm reduction in alcohol use, it is time to apply similar pragmatism to nicotine”.

Peter Beckett
Clearing the Air
hello@clearingtheair.eu
Visit us on social media:
X
LinkedIn
Bluesky
Instagram
Facebook

100 Million Lives Could Be Saved , But Only If We Act Now | Lives Saved Report 2025

Legal Disclaimer:

EIN Presswire provides this news content "as is" without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above.

Share us

on your social networks:
AGPs

Get the latest news on this topic.

SIGN UP FOR FREE TODAY

No Thanks

By signing to this email alert, you
agree to our Terms & Conditions